KCLUG

kclug@kclug.org

10 participants
3254 discussions

RE: Another PHP question
by Brian Densmore 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremy Turner > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:26:58AM -0600, Brian Densmore wrote: > > ... > > > Which one is the most powerful? > > gVim > > > Which one is the fastest to create in? > > gVim Ok, maybe I should rephrase that. I meant which is the most powerful and fastest in the context of being able to create huge amounts of code in the least amount of time and actual typing/clicking (i.e. RAD). And no vi in any of it's incantations doesn't qualify as a RAD tool. Creating web pages is inherently about creating large amounts of text. I'm looking for ways to cut down on the required amount of text (Think Visual Studio.Net, only better). Not all of us can type 5000 words a minute. I've used Bluefish and Quanta and I like them both. The Zend-Studio looks very much like the direction I want to go. I don't really need .Net drag-n-drop, but if I'm doing something like creating several pages accessing different portions of a database, then having code-snippets that I can select and drop in and customize makes life a lot easier and coding faster. Not to mention reducing the risk of typos. So I guess to expand on my question does Blue-fish or Quanta allow you to add items that would insert code-snippets and where do you like to go to get already been written code snippets? Brian D

1 0

RE: Usability rant [was RE: Help re-installing/restarting Xinerama]
by Brian Densmore 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Hutchins > > On Thursday 10 February 2005 12:15 pm, Brian Densmore wrote: > > > But wouldn't it be nice to be able to tell the installation program > > to remove those offending lines, or replace them > > with lines of resolution you want? > > It looks like the Mandrake 10.1 version of xorg is set up > that way - I no > longer have page after page of modelines, although I do have > several that > don't work. > > You also seem to be saying that you want an easy way to change screen > resolution that's not Ctrl-Alt-[+|-]. First, I think your > objection is bogus, Well, not quite what I was saying, but those modelines can get to be a pain. I was complaining about the selection of resolutions defaulting to 640x480, 800x600 and 1024x768. I'd like to tell the install program to drop the first two. And stop raining on my parade by showing solutions. It's hard enough to find anything to rant about on Linux today, as it is, without educated users pointing out solutions. ;') I'll have to look for the button you're talking about. What would be really nice to go along with the screen resize is to change the virtual desktop at the same time, so that you don't have to scroll to find menus and apps, and etc. I'm not sure who ever thought it would be neat to have a virtual desktop that is bigger than your screen... oh ... wait ... that's what the original post was about. ;') But then, at Least with Xinerama you don't need to scroll to see the whole desktop. I find scrolling the desktop to see my apps, well, bothersome. Brian

1 0

Displaying an ellipsis character in a terminal
by Gerald Combs 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

Is there any way within bash to display an ellipsis character in xterm, PuTTY, or other terminals in common use?

3 3

Usability rant [was RE: Help re-installing/restarting Xinerama]
by Brian Densmore 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

But wouldn't it be nice to be able to tell the installation program to remove those offending lines, or replace them with lines of resolution you want? I know how to do it by editing the X files, and my system already boots that way. However my semi-literate wife would totally lose it if she were to accidentally hit <ctrl><alt><+> and all of a sudden her entire desktop vanishes and is replaced with this new jigsaw puzzle piece of her old screen. This is the way she would see it. She wouldn't recognize the her screen resolution just changed. She would simply reply that that was a stupid thing to do and it just confuses her, couldn't I just get rid of that? As it is she gets frustrated enough, because I have been a lousy system administrator and haven't set up her account by activating all those things she might someday want to use. I love Linux, but there are still a lot of little things that need tweaking to make it easier to maintain. > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Bier > > Brian Densmore wrote: > |>-----Original Message----- > |>From: Leo Mauler > |> > | ... The issue I have is that be default it will create a 640x480 > | screen, then 800x600, then 1024x768. > | ... > | but I'd like to be able to install X and get it > | running at the resolution I choose or higher, not lower. > | ... > | I know my current desktop has the 640 and 800 options in > the X files. > | I've been to lazy to go and edit them out. > <snip /> > > All you have to do is change the order of the modes in the screen > subsection. > ~ This is what the section from my home desktop looks like. > > > Section "Screen" > ... > SubSection "Display" > ~ Depth 32 > ~ Modes "1600x1200" "1200x1024" "1024x768" > "640x480" "800x600" > ~ EndSubSection >

3 2

Help re-installing/restarting Xinerama
by Leo Mauler 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

I have a Matrox G450 Dual-Head card with two monitors hooked up to it. When I first installed Mandrake Linux 10.0, it gave me the option of stretching the desktop across to the second monitor, using Xinerama, which I chose to do. After a power failure at the house, the display no longer does this, and instead shows the same thing on both monitors. I can't find any configuration option in the GUI configuration system to reinstall/restart Xinerama. Do you know where the config file for this is? ===== And I always thought: the very simplest words Must be enough. When I say what things are like Everyone's heart must be torn to shreds. That you'll go down if you don't stand up for yourself Surely you see that. -- Bertolt Brecht __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

5 10

RE: Help re-installing/restarting Xinerama
by Brian Densmore 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Hutchins > > ... I'm sure more than one of us anticipated a far more > complicated problem, and > did not trust the simplicity of the obvious answer. > Hopefully Leo will let > us know if we were wrong. Don't you hate it when Occam is right? ;') I never trust anything to be simple when it comes to X. Perhaps, the geeklords of X have grown tired of the complexity as well? One can only hope. I hope to one day be able to tell the X config routine I have a 17" monitor and a video card and I want only 1024x768 resolution or better with more colors than I can count, and have X magically configure it for me. Ah ... I can dream, can't I?

3 3

Quick PHP question
by Brian Densmore 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

I'm sure I could look this up via google or something, but just want ed to ask a quick question to experienced PHP coders out there. Any way to quickly generate a clickable calendar (preferably like a template) with php? Something you could drop into an existing page and add code to do things when a person clicks on a date? Brian Densmore

2 1

RE: Help re-installing/restarting Xinerama
by Brian Densmore 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: Leo Mauler > > And I'd like to change existing resolutions quickly > and easily. This has always been easy to do, at least for as long as I have used Linux. <ctrl><alt><+> or <ctrl><alt><-> The issue I have is that be default it will create a 640x480 screen, then 800x600, then 1024x768. If you can't get anything else to work 640x480 will allow you to do most everything, but I'd like to be able to install X and get it running at the resolution I choose or higher, not lower. For years there was no way to do this without hacking the config files. I seem to remember at least one install I had recently allowed me to at least remove the lower resolutions, but I could just be dreaming. I know my current desktop has the 640 and 800 options in the X files. I've been to lazy to go and edit them out. Glad you got your video working again. Hopefully you have the changed config file someplace so you can do a "diff" on the original and changed to see what might have been the offending line(s)? Brian

2 1

RE: Another PHP question
by Charles, Joshua Micah (UMKC-Student) 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

I use Quanta under Suse 9.1. It's pretty nice, with extremely basic code completion. The big thing is syntax highlighting. Although I am really interested in hearing if anyone else has any better ideas. I'm currently working on a very large php project for a client, and anything better than Quanta would be great. Zend Studio also looks like a good choice, but I've never been able to get it to work. It's been a long time since I've tried, though, so I don't remember the specific issue. I may try again tonight and let you know. Links: Zend Studio: http://www.zend.com/store/products/zend-studio/beta.php Quanta: http://quanta.sourceforge.net/ RE: Your other e-mail: Php-Calendar: http://php-calendar.sourceforge.net/ I've not personally worked with it, but I hear it's good. Josh -----Original Message----- From: kclug-bounces(a)kclug.org [mailto:kclug-bounces@kclug.org] On Behalf Of Brian Densmore Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:27 AM To: KCLUG (E-mail) Subject: Another PHP question What about GUI editors? Anyone have a personal favorite? Which one is the most like an IDE? Which one is the most powerful? Which one is the fastest to create in? Ok so it's 5 questions. Brian Densmore CompuTech Business Solutions, Inc. (816) 880-0988 ext. 215 densmoreb(a)ctbsonline.com _______________________________________________ Kclug mailing list Kclug(a)kclug.org http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug

1 0

Re: Help re-installing/restarting Xinerama
by Jonathan Hutchins 10 Feb '05

10 Feb '05

One of the reasons for confusion on this seemingly obvious question (where's the conf file) is that those of us who've been running X on Linux for a couple of years have been through some changes. Even before the transition to XFree86 v.4 there were occasions where more than one conf file was involved in a sort of cascading effect. Most distros seem to have gone back to the single file now, but the practice still appears to be to include a LOT of different configuration options and have X sort out what works and what doesn't. My curent file, for instance, is unusually simple and only has four mode sections - only one of which works. A while ago I embarked on a quest to get my system running in 100dpi mode instead of the default 75dpi. I found many places where the setting was available, but none of them affected my actual X sessiosn at all. I eventually gave up on it - it doesn't really seem to matter anywhere except when printing graphics. I'm sure more than one of us anticipated a far more complicated problem, and did not trust the simplicity of the obvious answer. Hopefully Leo will let us know if we were wrong.

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

KCLUG