Organization Poll on the KCLUG Forums

[Brian Kelsay]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM, David Nicol <davidnicol at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Billy Crook <billycrook at gmail.com> wrote:
> > There is no question. The LUG needs formal organization. First and
> >  foremost, There needs to be an official 'position' of authority, and a
> >  fallback person for when the primary is unavailable.
>
> ...
>
> >  I think voting in person at a meeting is the best route. What are your
> thoughts?
> >
> >  Once chosen, the leader should be responsible for:
> >
> >       - LUG website
> >       - Mailinglist
> >       - Planning for LUG growth
> >       - Scheduling actual topics, or goals for the LUG
> >       - Events
>
> We could title said person "Den Mother"  :)
>
>
>
> that said, I've got some half-written infrastructure for holding weighted
> ranked approval voting operations which is one of my niche business
> projects for virtual organizations;  in case anyone would like to take
> it over from me and talk about requirements for doing web-based
> weighted ranked approval voting (wikipedia is a really good resource
> on approval voting and the various explored configurations and their
> strengths and weaknesses; including the kind that is used to
> select, for instance, the secretary general of the UN) please contact
> me off-list and
>
> --
> imagine the possibilities
> http://www.republicoflakotah.com/faq2.html
>

Or you could place all the members names/handles on pieces of paper, put
them in a hat and throw them up in the air.  Whoever sticks to the ceiling
is stuck with the job.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kclug.org/pipermail/kclug/attachments/20080314/a018a60f/attachment.htm