Linux on older laptops

[curt]

Quoting my  original post...

This should start a raging debate!

LOL Warning sarcasm ahead! LOL

The only immoral driver I'm aware of is "Ms. Poppy Cain" the uninsured drunk 
woman who plowed head on into my truck about 3 weeks ago and received her 2nd 
DUI for her efforts. However, ask twenty people to define morality and you 
will likely get as many answers. My immoral driver is someone else's 
unfortunate woman who made a mistake (but that doesn't make her immoral) and 
another may suggest that the accident was nothing more than karma...  that i 
am paying for my immorality. Further still, the only way to obtain a 
consensus supporting my definition is to selectively surround myself with 
only like- minded individuals who would never question my authority or 
definition of morality. I could name the group the "moral majority" if that 
name wasn't already taken...ROFLMAO





On Tuesday 03 January 2006 1:55 am, Tom Bruno wrote:
> If i write something, and make a piece of hardware, am I not entilted to
> keep the details to myself?
>
>
> How would it be immoral for me to not give away all the details of my
> creation?
>
> OSS is great, yes.  But to NOT be OSS be immoral... i think you are
> reaching.
>
> Providers of binary only software, or those whom will not co-op with the
> opensource community
> have just as much right to act that way, as those who do co-op with the
> community.  It is thier creation and
> they own all the rights.. which is why they can keep it closed..
>
> Freedom of speech, upholds the right to not speak.
> _______________________________________________
> Kclug mailing list
> Kclug at kclug.org
> http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug