test

[Tom Bruno]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

I myself like the untrimmed top post with a (scroll down)

Jason Clinton wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 09:38 -0600, Kelsay, Brian - Kansas City, MO
> wrote:
>> Huh?  WTF?  Over.  I'm just saying that maybe we ought to look at
>> the secondary MX record in DNS.
> ...
>> -----Original Message----- From: On Behalf Of Luke-Jr
> ...

Nice beautiful middle post.
>> On Thursday 16 February 2006 13:40, Kelsay, Brian - Kansas City,
>> MO wrote:
>>> Aha!  So the ILLIANA.net server (old server) is there and knows
>>> it
>> isn't
>>> supposed to be receiving the messages.  I'd say that whoever
>>> has the access to the DNS records for the LUG needs to remove
>>> the fallback MX record completely or shange it to something
>>> that can spool and eventually forward the mail correctly.
> ...
>> eh... want to 'federate' MX backup? :)
>
> Hal has control of kclug.org's DNS.
>
> That aside, a thread breaking, untrimmed bottom post followed by a
> thread breaking, untrimmed top post.
>
> PLEASE pick *something* and stick with it; following threads with
> postings from your mail client is becoming a field of archeology...
>
>
But you wont find that in any of the standards group that tell us how
we should send mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD9L2Jenu/hjGrfz4RAyL3AJ9JaUEe+eP1vG5xAzeuvbIOZMjzigCcDIrK
oMOMetYNS586ReNdK90WDk8=
=L6SR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----