test

[Jason Clinton]

On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 09:38 -0600, Kelsay, Brian - Kansas City, MO
wrote:
>  Huh?  WTF?  Over.  I'm just saying that maybe we ought to look at the
> secondary MX record in DNS.
...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Luke-Jr
...
> On Thursday 16 February 2006 13:40, Kelsay, Brian - Kansas City, MO
> wrote:
> > Aha!  So the ILLIANA.net server (old server) is there and knows it
> isn't
> > supposed to be receiving the messages.  I'd say that whoever has the
> > access to the DNS records for the LUG needs to remove the fallback MX
> > record completely or shange it to something that can spool and
> > eventually forward the mail correctly.
...
> eh... want to 'federate' MX backup? :)

Hal has control of kclug.org's DNS.

That aside, a thread breaking, untrimmed bottom post followed by a
thread breaking, untrimmed top post.

PLEASE pick *something* and stick with it; following threads with
postings from your mail client is becoming a field of archeology...

-- 
Jason Clinton <me at jasonclinton.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://kclug.org/pipermail/kclug/attachments/20060216/094e825f/attachment.pgp