May or May not be off-topic...

Mick Ohrberg mick at ohrberg.org
Fri Jan 3 01:12:15 CST 2003


Ah, I see. The simple stuff. :) So really, in order to get higher 'upload' speeds (from my point of 
view) I'd have to go to a broader droadband (at least upstreams) then...mo' money, mo' money, mo' 
money. 

Thanks for clarifying! :)

	/Mick

| -----Original Message-----
| From: owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net
| [mailto:owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Bill Cavalieri
| Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:45 PM
| To: Mick Ohrberg
| Cc: kclug at kclug.org
| Subject: RE: May or May not be off-topic...
| 
| 
| RR and most ISP's give you the bandwidth measured in kilo bits, and the
| absolute maximum on a clear day, when the moon is in alignment with your
| data line.
| 
| Depending on your cable line quality and signal strength, you could see
| less bandwidth or more loss.
| 
| You are thinking of the bandwidth in kilo bytes, not in kilo bits.
| 
| You can always count on around 10% bandwidth loss, so of your 384 kbits,
| you will really only see around 345 kbits.  Now divid the 384 kbits by
| 8, and you end up with around 43 kbytes/sec.
| 
| 
| Getting 34 kb/sec upstream over inexpensive routers is not bad, your
| realizing about 272 kbits.
| 
| -Bill
| 
| 
| On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 17:01, Mick Ohrberg wrote:
| > Dave,
| > 
| > Thanks for your efforts. I still think that seems a little 
| low... Or is that what you can expect? I mean, the theoretical 
| upstreams speed should be 384kbps, right?
| > 
| > 	/Mick
| > 
| > | -----Original Message-----
| > | From: owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net
| > | [mailto:owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of david at dacoto.com
| > | Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 4:44 PM
| > | To: kclug at kclug.org
| > | Subject: Re: May or May not be off-topic...
| > | 
| > | 
| > | I also use RR, I did a download of your file and it averaged 
| > | between 42 and
| > | 47kbps. I am on RR cable and behind a Linksys router with 3 
| other machines
| > | on the network.
| > | 
| > | Not sure if any of this info will help or not.
| > | 
| > | Dave
| > |  
| > | > I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time. It's 
| > | about the RR
| > | > upstreams speed. In short - I have a web/ftp server that won't 
| > | let anyone
| > | > download stuff (FROM my server) faster than 34kbps. My router 
| > | is a Netgear
| > | > RT314. The web/ftp server is running RedHat 8.0. Do you think 
| > | this is related
| > | > to my Linux installation, or the Netgear...or RR?
| > | > 
| > | > For a test, try to access http://www.ohrberg.org/implosion.mpg
| > | (a 15MB mpeg of
| > | > the implosion at 8th and Grand last summer).
| > | > 
| > | 
| > | 
| > | 
| majordomo at kclug.org
| > 
| > 
| > 
| -- 
| Bill Cavalieri <bcavalieri at gekl.net>
| 
| 




More information about the Kclug mailing list