RR / Cable Broadband pricing

[paul at kcnetcare.com]

Seth, get your facts straight.

Victory Secrets is not a regulated monopoloy like Time Warner Cable. There
are applicable laws and regulations that govern their behavior
differently. Hence, your legal advice is terrible.

Would you buy oil from Saddam if it was $20 per barrel or from Great
Britain for $40?

TWC has been over charging every single customer since it started service
many years ago. Only when Everest came along did they lower their prices
in Everest areas only. By the way, a friend just called TWC and told them
$59.99 IS NOT available in his area nor is it available to "everyone".

I would use Everest (or anyone) that competes with TWC just like I would
use anyone other than Southwestern Bell given the chance.

It's not just the prices, it's the attitude about sharing your wireless
Access Points, their (not so)acceptable use policy, and lack of support.

Until people like you get off their titty they will continually feed you
rancid milk.

Got milk?

Paul

Note, I live in an area where SWB nor TWC service. I use ISDN for Internet
access. I own rental property in an area where SWB and TWC service. The
current tenants do not use SWB and use TWC for RR only (since SWB doesn't
offer DSL at the addresss).

> Retention" pricing. In my opinion, that is entirely within their rights.
> In case you'd like to disagree, go right ahead; I won't argue. But note
> that this has been settled pretty clearly in the courts thanks to
> Victoria's Secret, who put different prices in their catalogs based on
> Zip Code.
>
> It is also TRUE that the $59.99/month plan I described for a Road Runner
> & Digital Cable package is an offer TWC makes to EVERYONE. It is NOT
> part of their "Customer Retention" pricing. If you don't believe me,
> call them and ask. (Do not bother to check their website as it is not
> mentioned there. I believe it is, as I mentioned before, called "Digital
> Tier I."
>
> Note that I do not work for either Everest or TWC (or Victoria's Secret,
> for that matter) and that everything in this e-mail is true as of today,
> to the best of my knowledge. But, I (obviously) do not speak in any
> official way for anyone but myself.
>
> -SD
>
>
>