DRM and the PRO-IP Act - Limited time opportunity?

[Adrian Griffis]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Christofer C. Bell
<christofer.c.bell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Adrian Griffis <adriang63 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Leo Mauler <webgiant at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> --- On Mon, 10/27/08, Jeffrey Watts <jeffrey.w.watts at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yet another thread that Leo has derailed with his BS.
>>>>
>>>> You don't like DRM.  WE ALL GET IT.  PLEASE MOVE ON.
>>>
>>> I like how you CC the mailing list on a personal argument so you can try and get support from the peanut gallery.  When you were a kid did you run to the teacher every time you didn't get your way?
>>
>> Just in case any of you are irony impared, you should note, this is irony!
>
> I wouldn't call it ironic since Jeffrey didn't CC the mailing list
> with a personal argument to try to get support from the peanut
> gallery.  Jeffrey quoted a posting Leo sent to the list himself.
> Here's the relevant header information if anyone would like to see for
> themselves:
>
> To: kclug at kclug.org
> In-Reply-To: <00221532ce0c7fb3aa045a28ca42 at google.com>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Message-ID: <311798.74347.qm at web56606.mail.re3.yahoo.com>

Are you sure?  It seems to me that Leo was criticising Jeffery for
something, but his very act of criticising Jeffery was at least as
offensive, in the way relevant to his criticism, as Jeffery's email.
Would that not qualify as ironic?

Adrian