Conversion to Linux

[Arthur Pemberton]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Sean Crago <cragos at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Sean Crago <cragos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> businesses.  Businesses care more about those things
>>>> than they do about the
>>>> minor differences between distributions.
>>>>>And companies like to have a good company to support
>>>>>the OS which gives them someone to sue if things go
>>>>>bad.
>>>
>>> Just out of curiosity, have you tried Canonical's support? I'll not
>>> argue about the certifications (personally, I rather loathe the
>>> concept, but I'll grant that Canonical's can't be as widespread or
>>> mature), but I haven't seen enough either way to say that Canonical's
>>> paid support is any better or worse than Red Hat's. Have you?
>>>
>>> Not an attack/really asking - It'd be good to hear what people have to
>>> say about them.
>>
>>
>> I haven't heard any good or bad about them in the server arena.
>> Personally I think they should have went with a commercial desktop
>> instead of trying to get a piece of the server pie.
>>
>> --
>> Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
>> ( www.pembo13.com )
>>
>
> I've used them on a number of projects, including my current personal
> server,

The commercial support? I think that's what the dude asked about.


-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )