test

[Kendric Beachey]

As for me, I will probably stay on the mailing list for the long haul,
in lurk mode as usual, but there's no way I plan to break my
multi-year streak of not going to any meetings in person, if there is
a chance Jason Clinton will be there.

On 2/17/06, Frank Wiles <frank at wiles.org> wrote:
>
>   Ok this is really getting ridiculous people.  I was hoping that
>   KCLUG would eventually pick back up and improve the signal to stupid
>   ratio, but it obviously hasn't.
>
>   Jason, this post is what finally did it for me.  Some tips for your
>   future, it's probably not wise to cuss at the community you have such
>   a vested interest in and for something as silly as mailing list
>   posting formats.  There are some really important and useful things
>   to be upset and passionate about in the real world, maybe you should
>   take up one of those as your crusade instead?
>
>   Your "concerned participation" is driving people away. I'm leaving and
>   I would wager I won't be the only one.
>
>  ---------------------------------
>    Frank Wiles <frank at wiles.org>
>    http://www.wiles.org
>  ---------------------------------
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:54:33 -0600
> Jason Clinton <me at jasonclinton.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 19:23 -0800, Jack wrote:
> > > location and by family history. You see, I find it
> > > very rude to have to wade through an email to find the
> > > bottom-posted comments. I find it much more showing of
> > >
> > > etiquette to reply on top or whereever it makes the
> > > most logical sense.
> >
> > For the third fucking time, the top vs. bottom posting was dropped. 1
> > year ago. Move on.
> >
> > > However, I also find it rude to hijack a thread
> > > requesting a solution for a problem to start a
> > > flamewar. And also for maintaining said flamewar.
> > > Hence the term flamebait.
> >
> > The offending post was in this thread. And I replied to the issue as
> > well. But very well; if you want to belabor the ALREADY resolved point
> > read below.
> >
> > > So what do we hear from the corner on fixing the MX
> > > record? Would an offer to host a backup MX record and
> > > forwarding host help? I could volunteer my server.
> > > Without the hope of fee or reward. I currently do not
> > > have a nameserver running on the box, but that is easy
> > > enough to fix.
> >
> > I discussed this at length with Hal on IRC tonight. In 2004, Mike
> > Neulip, offered to transfer the domain. We are not going to take him
> > up on that. However, we are going to transfer the DNS servers to our
> > own, though. I am initiating that request. The result of which will
> > take several days if not weeks. For the second time, end of thread.
> > Period.
> >
> > > As guilty as the rest of being rude from time to time,
> >
> > You are frequently rude, yes. Not everyone is, though.
> >
> > --
> > Jason Clinton <me at jasonclinton.com>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Kclug mailing list
> Kclug at kclug.org
> http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
>


--
Kendric Beachey