Interesting the AMD 2500 is a slower clock than the 2400

[Hanasaki JiJi]

Hey.. I like AMD too.  my slot A 600 outperforms the celeron 800. 
Anyone know how to fix the amd based board?  tis beeping :(  maybe a bad 
memory controller?  RAM chips work fine in the celeron board.

the point was the barton 2500 was a slower clock than the xp2400

Brian Densmore wrote:
> Actually not. They have a better design that allows them to process
> input at better efficiency than Intel's designs. AMD chips have changed
> significantly since they made 486 clones. They have even had Intel copy
> some of their ideas. AMD chips are superior to equivalent Intel chips. I
> use nothing but AMD chips for that reason and additionally Intel's
> founders are crooks who stole a patented idea from their boss and
> started their own company.
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Aaron [mailto:aaron at aarons.net]
>>Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:49 AM
>>To: numa at thenuma.com; kclug at kclug.org
>>Subject: Re: Ineresting the AMD 2500 is a slower clock than the 2400
>>
>>
>>I don't use AMD's for specifically this reason.  The VP of 
>>Marketing from
>>AMD and I had a discussion about this 10 years ago with the 
>>486's.  They
>>wanted to call their dx2-80 a dx4-100 because the performance 
>>was equivalent
>>(in their opinion).  I spent a three hour lunch explaining to 
>>him why that
>>was wrong.  Now they're doing it with the Thunderbirds.  It's 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
= Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the     =
=       right things.    - Peter Drucker                        =
=_______________________________________________________________=
=     http://www.sun.com/service/sunps/jdc/javacenter.pdf       =
=  www.sun.com | www.javasoft.com | http://wwws.sun.com/sunone  =