Without getting flamed, can someone answer me a question?
Jonathan Hutchins
hutchins at tarcanfel.org
Fri Aug 15 19:28:50 CDT 2003
On Friday 15 August 2003 2:03 pm, ismgr wrote:
> I was reading about the SCO deal and to be quite honest, I don't really
> understand the argument.
> That said, and not to cause a flame war, could one of you that is much
> more familiar with this issue enlighten me?
SCO (once the Santa Cruiz Operation, a UNIX spin-off), claims to own the IP
rights to portions of Unix code. The group currently operating under that
name purchased whatever they own of Unix from Novell, who have stated that
they retain the IP rights in question.
SCO has accused IBM in a lawsuit claiming that IBM is responsible for
incorporating the code in question into the Linux kernel. They have further
stated that this entitles them to demand license fees from all Linux users.
They have not stated what specific code they claim to own the rights to, and
as above Novell disputes that claim. However, by making the claim publicly
and staging a high-profile suit against IBM, they hope to either a)
intimidate some companies into paying them license fees to avoid the cost of
being sued and possibly loosing a judgement, and b) to discourage businesses
from adopting a product (Linux) which might make them liable for fees or
judgements in the future. They hope that licensed copies their own version
of Unix will be used in some of those cases.
Microsoft, ever the evil empire, has purchsed "licenses" of SCO's products for
a large sum of money in order to support this enterprise, as anything that
makes people reluctant to implement Linux is good for Microsoft. No-one is
quite sure what Microsoft needs Unix licenses for.
SCO has been hoping for some time that some large company will buy it up and
put it out of it's misery, as they really do not have terribly good
Intelectual Property resources in their inventory. Everything they sell is
pretty much sub-licensed from other sources, which can or could compete with
them.
One speculation is that they were hoping IBM would eliminate the nusiance of
the lawsuit by buying SCO, but IBM denies that there's any basis for the
suit, and IBM has the corporate legal staff to handle the claim.
More information about the Kclug
mailing list