(OT) private

[Hanasaki JiJi]

1. Is there a way to untrain when there is a false-positve?
2. does the spam go to a blackhole? folder? bounced?
	- how can each of the above three be accomplished?
I used SA about a year ago and am trying to catch up.
Thanks

Uncle Jim wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:44:48PM +0000, Jonathan Hutchins wrote:
> 
>>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-60.7 required=5.0
>>        tests=AWL,BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,
>>              REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT,USER_IN_WHITELIST,
>>              X_AUTH_WARNING
>>        autolearn=ham version=2.55
>>X-Spam-Level:
>>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
> 
> 
> 
>>Speaking of which, has anyone noticed that the May release of SpamAssassin 
>>doesn't catch as much as the releases from last fall?  Is this because they 
>>wanted to rely more on the Beysian filter?
> 
> 
> No, I've been quite happy with version 2.55.  Very little spam gets through
> and when I look at the spam which does, the Bayesian test usually shows at
> least 80%.  It took quite a bit of training before it started using the
> Bayesian filter.
> 

-- 
= Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the     =
=       right things.    - Peter Drucker                        =
=_______________________________________________________________=
=     http://www.sun.com/service/sunps/jdc/javacenter.pdf       =
=  www.sun.com | www.javasoft.com | http://www.sun.com/sunone   =