(OT) private

[Uncle Jim]

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:44:48PM +0000, Jonathan Hutchins wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-60.7 required=5.0
>         tests=AWL,BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,
>               REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT,USER_IN_WHITELIST,
>               X_AUTH_WARNING
>         autolearn=ham version=2.55
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

> Speaking of which, has anyone noticed that the May release of SpamAssassin 
> doesn't catch as much as the releases from last fall?  Is this because they 
> wanted to rely more on the Beysian filter?

No, I've been quite happy with version 2.55.  Very little spam gets through
and when I look at the spam which does, the Bayesian test usually shows at
least 80%.  It took quite a bit of training before it started using the
Bayesian filter.

-- 
Jim