Dwindling resources

[JD Runyan]

I'm pretty sure the list owner did reply, either that or someone faked
it pretty well.
-- 
Jason D. Runyan
Mid-Range Systems Administrator
USDA NITC Kansas City

On Apr 18 21:44, Lucas Peet wrote:
> What about a delegated list - we could all choose (or volunteer) someone (or
> a team of two or three - to cut down the workload) who's active on the list
> to be the maintainer(s).  It seems to me like it would be pretty hard to
> maintain a list when you don't take an active part in it.  (I say this
> because whoever the list maintainer is did not respond to the earlier post
> asking who it was.)
> 
> -Lucas
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Densmore" <DensmoreB at ctbsonline.com>
> To: <kclug at kclug.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:40 PM
> Subject: RE: Dwindling resources
> 
> 
> > I don't consider it off-topic. When I picked up my Linux Mag yesterday,
> > I really noticed it being much thinner than I am used to. I also noted
> > the cover price is significantly higher. I will be very upset to lose my
> > Linux Mag. I also don't want to see the list go away.
> > I would like to help make the spam and viruses go away. Even if only
> > some of the spam
> > goes away. I don't necessarily think we should any further burden to our
> > generous list manager to check and clear out "potential" spam every day.
> > There must be some tool that will aid in automatically removing this
> > stuff, even if it doesn't get it all.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jonathan Hutchins [mailto:hutchins at opus1.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:47 PM
> > > To: kclug at kclug.org
> > > Subject: Dwindling resources
> > >
> > >
> > > You know, I'd hate to loose this list, it makes a great
> > > resource in a time
> > > when we're loosing a lot of the Linux resources I'd come to count on.
> > > TheDukeofUrl is gone - used to be a great source for hardware
> > > reviews for
> > > Linux systems.  He was fair and bought his own hardware
> > > though, and there's
> > > no money in that.  Now all that's left are the corporate
> > > shills who never
> > > say anything bad about a product because the manufacturer might pull
> > > advertizing or not send them free samples any more.  And
> > > Linux Magazine, 108
> > > pages in November of 2000, is now down to a mere 64, and on
> > > cheaper, lighter
> > > paper at that.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > majordomo at kclug.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>