Monty's Logo EPS conversion in progress

[Tony Hammitt]

That's the one I personally like, too.
  I think that the idea of
'branding iron' is better served if the letters are pure red and
thinner.  That's how I've seen them on TV.

EPS is resolution independant and will look much better in high-
resolution.  Clicking on the picture on the page gets a bigger .gif.

I guess what I would like is to start a critique thread, and could
people please email me personally to say which one they like, so
we can decide which one to put on the banner?  Tom wants this done
really soon, so he can try to get a break on the price by not
having to rush the banner maker.

Please go here:

http://hammitt.com/Linux/index.html

and please send votes to: tony at hammitt.com 

or click one of these:

mailto:tony at hammitt.com?Subject=penguin4a.eps

mailto:tony at hammitt.com?Subject=penguin5b.eps

mailto:tony at hammitt.com?Subject=penguin6.eps

Thanks,

Tony

"Studebaker,Gregory" wrote:
> 
> Tony Hammitt wrote:
> 
> >Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 6:41 PM
> >To: kclug at kclug.org
> >Subject: kclug - Monty's Logo EPS conversion in progress
> 
> >I also made a .gif image so you can see what it looks like without using
> >ghostview.  Here's the stuff so far.
> >
> >http://hammitt.com/Linux/index.html
> >
> >Please take a critical look at this and send any feedback to
> >tony at hammitt.com
> 
> I like penguin5b.eps well enough.  I would like to see the shape of the
> branding iron have nice sharp edges.  If you used a microscope )or zoomed in
> on the "KC" branding iron, it looks a bit "lumpy, bumpy".  You asked us to
> be anal!  Maybe the "bumpy-ness" is more a function of the resolution of my
> monitor, or the ability of the .eps file to make nice smooth (dithered?
> feathered?) edges.
> 
> Greg Studebaker
> Work: 816-201-2088, gstudebaker at cerner.com
>     ~
>   .   .
>  /  V     Geeks, take back the net.
> /(     )>   ^^-^^
>