Stellar tech to ignite big-bang project

[Jeremy Fowler]

Ah your probably right. I opted for Home-Ecc instead of Stellar Particle
Acceleratory Physics because I thought it would be an easy 'A'. Geez, am I
regretting it now! Still, I'm sure the knowledge of how to sow yourself a pillow
might come in handy someday.

I just like to step-up on my digital soapbox and play the part of the cynical
doomsayer every once in awhile. ;-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Densmore [mailto:DensmoreB at ctbsonline.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 2:26 PM
> To: Jeremy Fowler; Kclug at Kclug. Org
> Subject: RE: Stellar tech to ignite big-bang project
>
>
> Not to worry we don't have any colliders big enough to blow up the
> planet.
> Probably nothing worse could happen than to blow up one or 2 continents
> at worst.
> ;)
> We're talk huge amounts of mass that need to be converted to energy to
> produce something like the light show going on in space. That was a
> super nova
> more mass than we have in our whole planetary system.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeremy Fowler [mailto:jfowler at westrope.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 2:05 PM
> > To: Kclug at Kclug. Org
> > Subject: OT: Stellar tech to ignite big-bang project
> >
> >
> > Anyone else see the problem of recreating the Big Bang?
> >
> > "Grey said scientists are pretty sure the collider will
> > produce the conditions
> > they need to create the particles, if they exist at all."
> >
> > Um... it's a BIG BANG dude. Like create-the-universe kinda bang. Like
> > blow-us-the-f*ck-up kinda big bang... Well, I'm sure they're
> > much smarter than
> > me, so I'll assume they know what their doing.
> >
> > http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103-995004.html
> >
> >
> >
> > majordomo at kclug.org
> >