Reply from Congressman Emanuel Cleaver concerning OrphanWorksActof 2008
rod
crimson.blue.2 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 14 21:59:00 CDT 2008
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Jon Pruente <jdpruente at gmail.com> wrote:
> The latest taxes stats that I've seen (for 2006) showed that the top
> 1% of tax payers paid almost half the taxes paid. That's nearly
> double the amount paid when taxes were higher under Carter. People
> like to hate the Bush tax cuts, but they are working. The proof is in
> the pudding. The top 51% of tax payers? They pay 97.something% of
> all taxes paid.
I think you should have qualified the taxes paid. You might have
meant 97% of Income Taxes paid not all taxes paid.
The IRA's site shows:
http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/article/0,,id=102886,00.html
Tax Stats at a Glance
Summary of Collections Before Refunds by Type of Return, FY 2007 [1]
Type of Return Number of Returns Gross Collections
Millions of $)
Individual income tax [1] 138,893,908 1,366,241
Corporation income tax [1] 2,507,728 [2] 395,536
Employment taxes [1] 30,740,592 849,733 [3]
Excise taxes [1] 907,165
53,050
Gift tax [1] 252,522
2,420
Estate tax [1] 49,924
24,558
This works out to Empoyment taxes (FICA and some others see the
footnote) being 31.5% of the total. Even if one assumes that the
upper 51% pay 100% of all the other taxes that still leave the upper
51% needing to pay about 90% of the Employment taxes to get to 97% of
all taxes. Given the flat nature of this tax (~12%) for moneys earned
under about $91k and the elimination of the tax on moneys over this
mark, I think "income" is the qualifier that should have been used in
your statement.
This data is form FY 2007, but I can't think of any big tax changes
from '06 to '07 that would make this inaccurate. You said your data
was from 2006. What was the source? It may have contained a
qualifier as to the type of tax. Maybe it contain state and locale
tax data?
Rod
More information about the Kclug
mailing list