proposed solution to signal to noise ratio problem

Paul Taylor paul at kcnetcare.com
Mon Feb 20 22:18:45 CST 2006


Take care KCLUG members. I'm unsubscribing because I'm too busy to read 
even all the on-topic material.

Thank you for the years of assisting me when I asked. It's appreciated!

Paul


David Nicol wrote:

>http://www.google.com/search?q=mlug lists dozens.  Which do you have in mind?
>
>But anyway, if KCLUG mailing list is not a good resource for your
>technical issues,
>don't use it for that.  In my opinion KCLUG is a social organization
>as well as a forum
>with technical discussions too.  I think splitting the list would
>exacerbate the problem.
>
>Mailing list culture is an organic, free-market kind of thing, and
>trying to impose some
>kind of structure tends to make such things less vibrant.
>
>So if those guys in Melbournewaulkeeidwayizzou have a split mailing list, with
>tech discussions on one channel and optional off-tech ranting on the other and
>that works for them I'm happy for them.
>
>I enjoy the off-topic ranting.  In fact I consider getting to read the
>off-topic ranting
>my payment for the occasional piece of useful advice I provide.  Which
>is getting less
>and less often as I become progressively less of a young fart.
>
>On 2/18/06, Jason Clinton <me at jasonclinton.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>By looking at their mailing list archives, it seems that MLUG's
>>application of this idea seems to have worked quite well for them...
>>
>>Thoughts?
>>--
>>Jason Clinton <me at jasonclinton.com>
>>    
>>
>
>I top post you.
>
>--
>David L Nicol
>all your mySQL databases are belong to us
>_______________________________________________
>Kclug mailing list
>Kclug at kclug.org
>http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kclug.org/pipermail/kclug/attachments/20060220/7f167890/attachment.htm 


More information about the Kclug mailing list