Somewhat OT: copyright question
Joe Fish
reverend.joe at gmail.com
Wed Jun 15 10:04:29 CDT 2005
Sorry, just lurking in this discussion, and I know this was just a typo
(since "liable" is spelled correctly plenty of times in the post), but I
thought its placement in the post was particularly funny:
On 6/14/05, Jonathan Hutchins <hutchins at tarcanfel.org> wrote:
<snip>
.... established, in large part through suits against AOL, that the
> Operators were not labile, provided they ...
>
<snip>
.... since I knew quite a few BBS operators "back in the day" and all of
them most certainly WERE
"labile"<http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn2.1?s=labile>....
;^)
JOE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kclug.org/pipermail/kclug/attachments/20050615/f3367084/attachment.htm
More information about the Kclug
mailing list