Proposed Web site redesign (beta)

Gerald Combs gerald at ethereal.com
Tue Nov 9 12:52:13 CST 2004


Jason Clinton wrote:
> Steven Hildreth wrote:
> 
>> Is w3/wia and w3/HTML compliance a requirement of the replacement
>> offering? Never was mentioned to me when I offered to create a new
>> modern, dynamic replacement site.
> 
> 
> I'm sorry no one said so. Anyone who does web design should already be
> familiar with those requirement; it's something of a given -- perhaps
> Hal and Chris assumed you knew that.
> 
>> No CMS stock package I have found (I have tested several for a
>> previous project including; PhpNuke, PostNuke, Slashcode, eGroupare,
>> Mambo, and XOOPS) generates either w3/wia or w3/HTML compliant code.
> 
> 
> We may be able to yet find one that does.

Such as plone?  From http://www.plone.org:

  "Plone is standard. Plone carefully follows standards for usability
   and accessibility. Plone pages are compliant with US Section 508, and
   the W3C's AA rating for accessibility, in addition to using
   best-practice web standards like XHTML and CSS."



More information about the Kclug mailing list