SCO question (Stock Price)

[lerninlinux at comcast.net]

The purchasing is what SCO wanted from IBM in the first place.  IBM said no thanks, we tried OS/2 
and learned.  So SCO try 2,  if we sue they will buy us as a settlement.  Now with all the other 
stuff happening, I was hoping to see the stock drop to penny status, then the Lug's, FSF, OSDN, and 
a few other groups could buy the stock in mass.  Fire the board and open it up.  Still would have a 
few licensing issues, but since Novell bought Suse, I think they could be resolved.

just my .02
> Oh, they will find him guilty.  The Feds made too big a deal about 
> nailing him in press conferences to back down now.  He may actually 
> spend a little time at some federal minimum security country club 
> playing golf and writing a book, but he won't get anything near what he 
> deserves.
> 
> I doubt anything will happen to Sprint.  Esrey bailed and reportedly has 
> cancer, so I doubt anything will happen to him, even though he was just 
> as involved in the dirty dealings as Ebbers.  Meanwhile, the FON/PCS 
> stock price continues to SUCK!
> 
> Unfortunately, the entire market is down hard this week.  It is not just 
> SCO, although a bond rating drop will hammer share prices!  Couldn't 
> happen to a nicer company!   (WAA HAA HAA Haaa!)
> 
> Perhaps all the companies that have been sued by SCO should combine 
> legal funds and just BUY the stinking company, break it up, and convert 
> any valid licenses - IF there are any -  to open source!  At least there 
> would be SOME good come out of all this. 
> 
> They should also publicly black list the employees that were involved in 
> the dirty dealings!
> 
> Michael Shaw wrote:
> 
> >I'm cynical enough to believe it's going to have to get a whole lot colder
> >in hell before Mr. Ebbers and those of his ilk recieve their just rewards at
> >the hands of our legal system.  Won't happen in my lifetime anyway.
> >
> >Michael Shaw
> >(816)525-2794
> >dbwizzard at kc.rr.com
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Brian Kelsay <BLKELSAY at kcc.usda.gov>
> >To: <kclug at kclug.org>
> >Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 10:22 AM
> >Subject: RE: SCO question (Stock Price)
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>>>>"Brian Densmore" <DensmoreB at ctbsonline.com> 03/11/04 10:01AM >>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >><snip>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>In addition to the fact that it looks as though they are under
> >>>      
> >>>
> >investigation by the SEC >and that even Business Week is starting to pick up
> >on the shady goings on. I give SCO >months to live, not years. I'd say by
> >July, September at the latest SCO will be out of >business, and hopefully
> >some of it's officers in the criminal courts system (wishful >thinking on
> >the criminal charges I know).
> >  
> >
> >>--------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>Well, they are going after Bernie Ebbers of Worldcom, Martha Stewart and
> >>    
> >>
> >the Enron boys.  I can't wait til they hoist these guys up for public
> >ridicule.  And Sprint can't be far behind.
> >  
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>Brian Kelsay
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> -- 
> If you examine how Bill Gates funded research into solving the social issues he 
> is concerned about las year, you would notice that he is 14 times more concerned 
> about the global threat of Linux than he is about AIDS. 
> 
> This is understandable when you consider the method of transmission.  I suspect 
> Bill is probably much more likely to get Linux than he is to get AIDS!!!  After 
> all, you can download and install Linux by yourself!
> 
>