KDE vs. Gnome

[Hanasaki JiJi]

comments on the below?

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: KDE vs. Gnome
Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:45:27 -0600 (CST)
Resent-From: debian-user at lists.debian.org
From: Johan Ehnberg <johan at ehnberg.net>
To: debian <debian-user at lists.debian.org>
References: <00c501c2e970$7ef6aee0$6800817d at guilherme>

Some thoughts... (gnome2, Kde3)
I myself use gnome2

KDE: good
-Better integration
-Good looking
-Konqueror inegration
-Easy to use
-Consistent naming

KDE: bad
-Arts
-Bad support in Konqueror
-DisKusting names

Gnome:good
-Easier to choose between apps (as in easier not to use Konq. for example)
-Nautilus2
-Nice applets & panels
-Gdm2 looks good
-Inconsistent naming (as in freedom of naming)

Gnome:bad
-Bad consistency in menus, settings etc.
-WM and DE not integrated
-Inconsistent naming (gtk-something, gnome-something, justsomething...
never know what uses GTK)

/johan

GBV wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I prefer KDE, Gnome seens obsolete, and using gtk lib i´m able to use Gnome
>appz on KDE with no problems at all,
>
>My objective with this message is to gather advantages and disvantages of
>this two great softwares..
>
>Post your user and developer experience...
>
>thks...
>
>Guilherme Viebig
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Johan Ehnberg
johan at ehnberg.net
"Windows? No... I don't think so."

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request at lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
listmaster at lists.debian.org

-- 
= Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the     =
=       right things.    - Peter Drucker                        =
=_______________________________________________________________=
=     http://www.sun.com/service/sunps/jdc/javacenter.pdf       =
=  www.sun.com | www.javasoft.com | http://wwws.sun.com/sunone  =