OT]Resolution [was: Flat panel monitors

[numa at thenuma.com]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [OT]Resolution [was: Flat panel monitors]
From: <numa at thenuma.com>
To: <gedascher at multiservice.com>

There are other issues for a panel besides resolution.  A lot of it has
to do with response time.  Everyone knows that games on a laptops is
horrible, but a desktop, well, it's expected to be able play games.  My
understanding is that to get quicker transistors (the panel is all
transistors) they end up being a bit bigger, hence lower resolution.
Kris.

> My main question/point was:
>
> 	Why doesn't anyone produce stand-alone flat panel displays that have
> the
> same resolution as their same-sized laptop screen counterparts?
> 1600x1200 looks great on my 15" laptop display.
>
> Gene
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net
>> [mailto:owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Tony
>> Zafiropoulos Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:08 PM
>> To: Kclug
>> Subject: Re: [OT]Resolution [was: Flat panel monitors]
>>
>>
>> I bought a MAG innovision for $439 or so LT765S it can go to
>> 1280x1024.
>>
>> BestBuy.
>>
>> I don't like some of it's black screen issues though, gets a bit
>> fuzzy with a black window.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Gene Dascher wrote:
>>
>> > Has anyone seen a standalone flat panel display that has
>> resolution better
>> > than 1024x728?  Even the 17" ones I have looked at in the
>> stores only go up
>> > to that resolution.  My laptop is 2 years old, and its 15"
>> display goes up
>> > to 1600x1200.
>> >
>> > Gene
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Tony Zafiropoulos
>> FixMyVirus.com
>> Cel: 314-504-3974
>> tonyz at fixmyvirus.com
>> Best way to reduce your virus exposure?
>> Run Linux - Replace Windows one system at a time.
>>
>>
>>
>> majordomo at kclug.org Enter without the quotes in body of message
>
>
>
> majordomo at kclug.org Enter without the quotes in body of message