OT]Resolution [was: Flat panel monitors

[Matt Graham]

I'm guessing that it's a pricing issue.  I'm still being told that half the
cost of my laptop is the screen.  It does 1600x1200 and looks awesome.  So,
if I'm paying over 1000 for the screen on this laptop, maybe the 15'' flat
panel I get for $300 wouldn't be as great.

Matt

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Dascher" <gedascher at multiservice.com>
To: "Kclug" <kclug at kclug.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:34 PM
Subject: RE: [OT]Resolution [was: Flat panel monitors]

> My main question/point was:
>
> Why doesn't anyone produce stand-alone flat panel displays that have the
> same resolution as their same-sized laptop screen counterparts?  1600x1200
> looks great on my 15" laptop display.
>
> Gene
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net
> > [mailto:owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Tony Zafiropoulos
> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:08 PM
> > To: Kclug
> > Subject: Re: [OT]Resolution [was: Flat panel monitors]
> >
> >
> > I bought a MAG innovision for $439 or so LT765S it can go to 1280x1024.
> >
> > BestBuy.
> >
> > I don't like some of it's black screen issues though, gets a bit fuzzy
> > with a black window.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Gene Dascher wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone seen a standalone flat panel display that has
> > resolution better
> > > than 1024x728?  Even the 17" ones I have looked at in the
> > stores only go up
> > > to that resolution.  My laptop is 2 years old, and its 15"
> > display goes up
> > > to 1600x1200.
> > >
> > > Gene
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Tony Zafiropoulos
> > FixMyVirus.com
> > Cel: 314-504-3974
> > tonyz at fixmyvirus.com
> > Best way to reduce your virus exposure?
> > Run Linux - Replace Windows one system at a time.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>