Another note on KDE 3.1

[Brian Densmore]

When did Redhat start including KDE 3.1?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Graham [mailto:linux at bizniche.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:54 PM
> To: Jonathan Hutchins
> Cc: KCLUG (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Another note on KDE 3.1
> 
> 
> Yes, from what I know, it's just a desktop configuration, or 
> theme.  (Icons,
> backgrounds, menu's, etc.)
> 
> That's why I wondered.  Under bluecurve...KDE and Gnome look nearly
> identical.
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathan Hutchins" <hutchins at tarcanfel.org>
> To: "Matt Graham" <linux at bizniche.com>
> Cc: "KCLUG (E-mail)" <kclug at kclug.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Another note on KDE 3.1
> 
> 
> > Quoting Matt Graham <linux at bizniche.com>:
> >
> > > Aside from an asthetics point of view, what do you like 
> better about
> KDE3.1
> > > over Gnome?
> >
> > > Looking at redhat8 with bluecurve, kde and gnome look the 
> same (from an
> > > asthetic configuration pov.)   Does KDE have some other 
> features that
> I"m
> > > not noticing?
> >
> > Isn't bluecurve essentially a Gnome and KDE theme?
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> >
> >
> majordomo at kclug.org
> 
> 
> 
> majordomo at kclug.org
>