tax protest case goes to trial
Marvin [GodfatherofSoul] Bellamy
mbellamy at kc.rr.com
Thu Nov 21 04:26:37 CST 2002
I wouldn't be so hard on the guy. This is obviously a statement he's
making, and I don't think he expects to win. Give him some credit for
having the cajones to try. Lawyers and judges affect the legal system
in a way that guarantees their job safety. Heck, a lot of the time
decisions are made based on favor-swapping between attorneys. A sad
profession indeed.
I'll try to dig up those resources on the "income tax is illegal"
argument. Let me know if anyone has a lead.
zscoundrel wrote:
> Nope. The incredibly stupid sh*t head is representing himself!!! He
> will lose on a technicality and the appears court will refuse to hear
> the appeal and WE will all suffer for hs stupidity.
>
> This moron is going to blow it for all 250 million of us. His
> bumbling will set a precedent and no court will ever hear a case for
> this type of defense again. (I is called summary judgment. You make
> a petition asking the judge for summary judgment if you can show that
> a case was decided with issues similar to yours. If the judge agrees,
> you get the same verdict, only none of the liars - uh - lawyers have
> to work for their money.)
>
> Judges and Lawyers do NOT want us to get the idea that we can do it
> ourselves, so they stick together on this point.
>
> It would be cool if he had some novel angle and was a really wiz-bang
> legal eagle, but the judge cut short his opening argument because he
> was rambling. How fair a trial do you think he is really going to get
> by representing himself???
>
> No, this case is past the point of no return. To use a scatological
> reference, the chain has been pulled, the water is swirling around,
> but nothing has disappeared from sight yet. Things will swirl for
> several days and then the judge will make his finding and things will
> suck.
>
>
>
> Paul Taylor wrote:
>
>> No income tax case had been taken to the Supreme Court. Maybe this one
>> will and the high court shocks the nation. :o) We can only dream...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net
>> [mailto:owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Dana
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:04 PM
>> To: kclug
>> Subject: Re: tax protest case goes to trial
>>
>> All of his arguements have been used before. He will be found
>> quilty, forced to pay back taxes and penalties and probably be sentenced
>> to 6 months in jail for wasting the governments time.
>>
>> Dana
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "david" <whatever at davidnicol.com>
>> To: <ellings at kcnet.com>; "kclug" <kclug at kclug.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:43 PM
>> Subject: tax protest case goes to trial
>>
>>
>>
>>> Here it is, the test case all us would-be tax protesters have been
>>> waiting for
>>> http://www.post-gazette.com/localnews/20021119kleinpaste7p7.asp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> majordomo at kclug.org
>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Kclug
mailing list