Speed test (results from first test)

[Jason]

Here is my test on a Dual PII 450 - 512KB cache  , (I know it is a single 
thread test) if ram matters I have 1GB running Slackware 8.1

bash-2.05a# ./nbench

BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)

TEST                : Iterations/sec.  : Old Index   : New Index
                    :                  : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT        :          195.66  :       5.02  :       1.65
STRING SORT         :          18.139  :       8.10  :       1.25
BITFIELD            :      5.8663e+07  :      10.06  :       2.10
FP EMULATION        :          11.927  :       5.72  :       1.32
FOURIER             :          3646.3  :       4.15  :       2.33
ASSIGNMENT          :          2.5679  :       9.77  :       2.53
IDEA                :          412.37  :       6.31  :       1.87
HUFFMAN             :          197.34  :       5.47  :       1.75
NEURAL NET          :           3.876  :       6.23  :       2.62
LU DECOMPOSITION    :          113.53  :       5.88  :       4.25
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX       : 6.958
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 5.335
Baseline (MSDOS*)   : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
C compiler          : gcc version 2.7.2.3
libc                : libc.so.5.4.38
MEMORY INDEX        : 1.884
INTEGER INDEX       : 1.634
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 2.959
Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
bash-2.05a#
bash-2.05a# FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 2.959
bash: FLOATING-POINT: command not found
bash-2.05a# Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, 
libc-5.4.38
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `(LINUX)'
bash-2.05a# * Trademarks are property of their respective holder.

On Sunday 10 November 2002 8:02 pm, Mick Ohrberg wrote:
> I found something called nbench
> (http://www.tux.org/~mayer/linux/bmark.html). You may want to give it a
> whirl. Unfortunately, since it's a single-threaded test, your duals won't
> do you much good. I haven't been able to find a multi-threading test yet.
>
> 	/Mick
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net
> | [mailto:owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Jason
> | Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 6:42 PM
> | To: Mick Ohrberg; kclug at kclug.org
> | Subject: Re: Speed test (results from first test)
> |
> |
> | What is this test?  I have a dual PPro 200 and a Dual PII 450
> |
> |
> | Jason
> |
> | On Sunday 10 November 2002 4:54 pm, Mick Ohrberg wrote:
> | > Hm, it seems that (in this test), the SPARC was slowest. Keep in mind,
> | > however, that the compiled code that gcc generates on the SPARC is
>
> 32-bit
>
> | > code (right?). Now on to find a multi-threading test! :)
> | >
> | > 	/Mick
>

-- 
http://www.hailmaryfullofgrace.net