AOTC and GeekPAC

[Aaron]

Here is my original e-mail.

> > Geeezz.  You people are a bunch of whiny babies.

Here is a whiny baby response.

>   No, we just aren't communicating.

Then.... more whining follows.

>   Why do you think that showing a half-dozen references for 'predatory' in
> any way proves that 'preditory' is a word?

Then I chime in with an answer:
Because it was already said e-mails ago that it was a spelling mistake, yet
you insist on spelling it wrong to make some point no one cares about.

>   If you've been following this at all, you know that we had a 'paper'
> announced in which the word 'where' was used in the place of the word
> 'were'.

(*Hears sad violin music in the backround.*)

>I mentioned that just running your 'paper' through a spell checker
> would not catch a case where (heh) you misspelled a word in such a way
that
> it was still a word (just not the one you meant) and therefore ....
<<SNIP>>

It basically goes on to whine about some misspelling that's already been
corrected.  Then he explains that he hasn't gotten laid in years and that
his mother beat him as a child.  Then, after the sniveling and bitching, he
finally finishes:

> Should I invest anything in someone purporting to represent my interests
who doesn't meet this
> incredibly low standard?

(Like his last date?)

> If they don't care enough about what they're writing as
> professional communicators to actually run a spell-checker, much less have
a
> human or twelve proofread their work, why should I give them any credence
> whatsoever?

The point is you shouldn't.  Don't they make a 12 step program for people
like you?  Why do you insist on filling my mailbox with crap like this?

Aaron