Intellectual Ammunition

Monty Harder lists at kc.rr.com
Sat Sep 15 03:05:20 CDT 2001


Jonathan Hutchins <hutchins at opus1.com> wrote:

>Think of it as being similar to reading the message over telnet - not a lot
>of bandwidth for that.
>
>Of course, if everybody uses 24bit graphic stationery, we could be talking
>trouble...

  If you'd seen some of the crap I see in my Inbox every day, you'd know why
I'm concerned about bandwidth. We have people who mail stuff like that to a
list that sends a copy to every single person in the company, with no good
reason for it.

>server is an advantage for me.  We (my company) and I (my
>home/shop/lab/clients) don't ever back up workstations except with
something
>like Ghost.  Workstations are as disposable as Kleenex.  Dr. A. kicked his

  I understand this mentality, and so long as storage space on a server is
allowed, I endorse it.

>> I wonder how many had offsite backup?

>Seriously, I've had contact with people who work for companies who have
>offices there, and if you asked them that question they'd assume you were
>from another planet or something.  It was the WORLD Trade Center.  You
>didn't get there by playing stupid.

  I wonder if my company gets this.




More information about the Kclug mailing list