Intellectual Ammunition
Monty Harder
lists at kc.rr.com
Sat Sep 15 03:05:20 CDT 2001
Jonathan Hutchins <hutchins at opus1.com> wrote:
>Think of it as being similar to reading the message over telnet - not a lot
>of bandwidth for that.
>
>Of course, if everybody uses 24bit graphic stationery, we could be talking
>trouble...
If you'd seen some of the crap I see in my Inbox every day, you'd know why
I'm concerned about bandwidth. We have people who mail stuff like that to a
list that sends a copy to every single person in the company, with no good
reason for it.
>server is an advantage for me. We (my company) and I (my
>home/shop/lab/clients) don't ever back up workstations except with
something
>like Ghost. Workstations are as disposable as Kleenex. Dr. A. kicked his
I understand this mentality, and so long as storage space on a server is
allowed, I endorse it.
>> I wonder how many had offsite backup?
>Seriously, I've had contact with people who work for companies who have
>offices there, and if you asked them that question they'd assume you were
>from another planet or something. It was the WORLD Trade Center. You
>didn't get there by playing stupid.
I wonder if my company gets this.
More information about the Kclug
mailing list