Linux Konquers the Graphic Arts [RE: Wine, Whine, installs, and the like]

[Gene Dascher]

Actually, to get Maya Complete, it is only $7500 ;)  If you want Maya
Unlimited, then you pay $16,000!  Oy.

To address this topic, have you seen '405 - The Movie'?
<http://www.405themovie.com/Home.asp>

That is a GREAT short that was done entirely on home PCs and shot with a
hand held digital video camera.  What a great way to break into the
"business".

If you can't tell, I have a great love for this sort of thing!

Gene

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Densmore [mailto:DensmoreB at ctbsonline.com]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Kclug
Subject: Linux Konquers the Graphic Arts [RE: Wine, Whine, installs, and
the like]

Yes. You too can be a big famous movie-maker, for $10,000 for the
software (can't remember the brand off hand, Dreamworks and Pixar both
use this software) and $5000 for a killer server.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gene Dascher [mailto:gedascher at multiservice.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:17 AM
> To: Kclug
> Subject: RE: Wine, Whine, installs, and the like
>
>
> Actually, I read somewhere just the other day that both
> Dreamworks and Pixar
> have, either in full or part, switched over to using Linux in their
> production shops for both workstations(cell and 3D animation) and
> servers(render farm, file servers)!  There was an article in
> Linux Journal a
> few issues back about the switch over that Dreamworks has
> been making.  For
> the render farm, the SGI boxes that used to take 50 feet of
> wall space have
> been replaced with Linux rackmount systems that take up about
> the space of a
> refrigerator!  You gotta love technology!
>
> Gene
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Densmore [mailto:DensmoreB at ctbsonline.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:57 AM
> To: kclug at kclug.org
> Subject: RE: Wine, Whine, installs, and the like
>
>
> This is not flamebait either, but I know many artists who
> would fight you
> tooth and nail, or at least pencil and paintbrush, on this.
> Mac is used
> extensively by artists. But Linux is rapidly gobbling up this
> market. Alas,
> I see doom in Mac's future.
> Cases in point :
> Titanic (the movie), Shrek, Lord of the Rings (due for
> release very soon -
> and I might add - IT'S ABOUT FREAKIN' TIME!)
>
> Sorry about that, but Middle Earth is a touchy subject for
> me. Frodo Lives!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Palmer [mailto:repalmer at sunflower.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:48 AM
> To: Steve Johnson; 'kclug at kclug.org'
> Subject: RE: Wine, Whine, installs, and the like
>
>
> Steve,
>
>
> At 9:07 PM -0600 11/8/01, Steve Johnson wrote:
>
>
> Yes Mac OS is great as long as you don't attempt to run any real
> applications,
> or network it, or do any real work with it.  OS-X is great as
> long as you
> don't try to use any Mac aps on it.  I'm in the GA business,
> so I know just
> a
> teensy bit about what I say on this subject....
>
>
>
>
> This isn't a flame...just a long standing observation.  Don't
> want to get
> into a Mac vs the world thing.  But anyone that makes
> statements about the
> Mac OS like that simply hasn't ever use it or been around it.  You're
> repeating an urban legend of the first order-created and maintained by
> Microsoft.
>
>
> Wine, Windows and other junk........
>
>
> I routinely run Windows  in emulation-under OS 9
> emulation-under OS X on a
> 350 MHz iMac/786 megs RAM.  Runs about 200 MHz fast.  :)
>
>
> Scattered files.....
>
>
> I think the beef with OS X for most Mac folks is exactly that
> scattered file
> thing-Mac people are used to concrete places to put stuff which can be
> thrown away in a snap if you don't like it-back to square one
> no harm done.
> I've found that its easier to get a Mac user up to speed on a
> PC because
> they have no fear of screwing things up when they should be
> very afraid.
> Converting PC people to Macs is more difficult because
> (formerly-OS 9) they
> were very afraid of screwing things up when they should have
> been having
> fun.   My guess is that Apple will be a dual OS company for
> quite sometime.
> Maybe that's the way it should be.
>
>
> Lastly and most important....
> Revisiting community/public networking/wireless .
>
>
> I do want to get back and discuss this seriously.  I posted
> that article
> nearly 2 months before it popped up on the list.  Recently
> we've been really
> busy and I haven't had a chance to respond. So in a nut shell:
>
>
> Sunflower is a not for profit.  Sunflower has a long term
> track record of
> slugging it out with the corporate giants, improving/growing,
> and staying in
> business.  Someone wanted to know what Sunflower brought to the table.
> Frankly, Sunflower is the "public network" table right now.
> All the rest is
> pipe dream.   If there is interest in shaping the direction
> etc then that
> requires participation.
>
>
> Sunflower is willing to finance things to whatever degree it
> can.  I don't
> mean to minimize the financial commitment- it will be large.
> Make no bones
> about it though-its a boot strap thing...but that's good.
> That's why it can
> work.  That's why you and me can play.  That's why the
> corporate giants will
> hate us.
>
>
> We've been in discussions for a year with a national
> satellite TV provider
> that needs Internet at apartment complexes where they can't
> put up dishes.
> That can provide a place to put broadcast stuff.  We could
> close that deal
> if we had the manpower to actually get it done.
>
>
> Nothing should be on the slide.  We can't build it unless its
> all legal.
> The big guys will shut us down if it isn't.
>
>
> I think those were the important points.
>
>
> All our effort right now is going towards becoming the first
> national not
> for profit ISP.  We want to claim the title of NPR or PBS of
> computing. That
> brings money and power to negotiate.  The national network is
> hot and we're
> on the financial clock tweaking the back end systems so we're swamped
> messing with those pesky hidden files.  :)  We will use the
> national network
> to build out these wireless systems where ever there is
> interest.  Interest
> being defined as people who take the initiative trying to get
> things done.
> :)
>
>
> end caffeine rant,
>
>
> rick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 9:07 PM -0600 11/8/01, Steve Johnson wrote:
> Nope, your not offensive, just omnipotent and pontificative.
>
> Yes Mac OS is great as long as you don't attempt to run any real
> applications,
> or network it, or do any real work with it.  OS-X is great as
> long as you
> don't try to use any Mac aps on it.  I'm in the GA business,
> so I know just
> a
> teensy bit about what I say on this subject....
>
> I do agree with your philosophy with learning, except I try
> to learn 10 new
> things a day.
>
> sj
>
>
>
> >===== Original Message From D. Hageman
> <SMTP:dhageman at dracken.com> =====
> >On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Steev Johnson wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, I have to deal with MAC OS too much already
> thank you.
> >
> >Mac OS is a great operating system and I think that the new
> releases have
> >a lot of potential.   Shoot almost every GUI shell since
> then has tried to
> >replicate it to some degree or another.
> >
> >> It must be great to know everything.
> >
> >Well, I don't know everything yet, but I work closer to that
> goal every
> >day.  Some people say I won't ever reach that goal, but oh well - you
> >gotta try right?  I get the impression that you found some
> of my comments
> >offensive - please look at placement of the smileys to assist you in
> >interperting my comments.  As for the rest of my reply -
> their is good
> >information in there.  I find it a wasted day when I don't learn
> >something.  :-)
> >
> >
> >>
> >> sj
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: D. Hageman [mailto:dhageman at dracken.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:27 PM
> >> To: Steev Johnson
> >> Cc: kclug at kclug.org
> >> Subject: Re: Wine, Whine, installs, and the like
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Steev Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >> > I saw the posts on WINE and I thought about the fact
> that the only way
> >>
> >> > I can bear installing software on Linux is to drink some
> wine first.
> >> > Now
> >>
> >> Well, if that is what you have to do then that is what you
> have to do.
> >> I
> >> recommend that if you think that you are becomming an alcoholic you
> >> switch
> >> to Mac OS.  :-)
> >>
> >> > Well, so does Linux.
> >>
> >> No.
> >>
> >> Depends on the distrobution you run and what the philosphy
> is.  If you
> >> get
> >> a BSD style distro you will find that you have neat little
> directories
> >> for
> >> most major pieces of software with the binaries soft
> linked back into
> >> your
> >> path.  RPM/DEB based distros do spread files around, but
> if you know how
> >>
> >> to use your package tool you can find the files very easily.
> >>
> >> rpm -ql <package>
> >>
> >>
> >> > Let's take for example the MYSQL package as implemented
> under Trustix,
> >>
> >> > or any other distribution for that matter.  None of the
> RPMS really
> >> > WORK to get it installed, there is still tons of Mickey
> mouse to make
> >> > it work
> >> > - if it ever does.
> >>
> >> Well, sounds like you need to write the maintainers of the
> RPM and let
> >> them know that their RPMs are broken.
> >>
> >> > trying to figure out why safe_mysqld hangs.   What every
> happened to
> >> the
> >> > glorious days of DOS when everything was in the same
> %$&! directory!?
> >> > What was wrong with that?
> >>
> >> Nothing, see above.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Yes, I understand the shared data and the centralized config
> >> > can/should be somewhere else, but this is just a mess!
> Whether it
> >> > gets installed under /usr/bin or /usr/shared or
> usr/local or whatever
> >> > seems to depend on how someone was feeling that day.  Much like
> >> > windows.  At least with windows, I KNOW there are only a
> couple places
> >>
> >> > other than the app directory that they are going to dump
> DLLs and the
> >> > like.
> >>
> >> And why ... because you have run Windows for so long.  It is called
> >> experience.
> >>
> >> > cobol.  If I can't figure this stuff out easily, how is
> the average
> >> > sysop ever going to be able to deal with this?
> >>
> >> No matter how I answer this question it will be bad.  I
> will pass ;-)
> >>
> >> Have fun!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >//========================================================\
> >||  D. Hageman                    <dhageman at dracken.com>  ||
> >\========================================================//
>
>
>
> majordomo at kclug.org
>