I disagree.  I consider PGP signature blocks at least as
relevant as half the traffic on this forum.

We can now, should we care to, get completely certain that 
the message apparently from Jason Clinton was sent by someone
using Jason Clinton's computer.

I, too, want a MUA that automatically signs everything! I just
don't want to spend the focused hour it will take to set it up.

On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 12:21, DCT Jared wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:45:56 -0600, Jason Clinton wrote:
> >The only generally accepted posting etiquette on this list is trimming
> >irrelevant text from the quoted message; a practice that all three of
> >you did not employ.
> >
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
> >Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> >iD8DBQFAPjDUtSqjk42zvwkRAu4GAKDDXsNxaQ/GMbIEx2nK+5TKw8abWgCfVK5m
> >Qi1SXfn8nFEEsRT7MFgl61o=
> >=9XRy
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> All four of us. My email client renders your PGP
> stuff inline as quoted above.
> 
> -Jared
> 
> 
> 
-- 
david nicol
                                            War is hell.