I thought so too when I first read it!  Funny thing is, my brand new 
spam filter originally tagged the note as spam.  I just figured it was 
too new to be fully trained yet.  Perhaps this new filter is better than 
I thought!   (grin)

Scott Smith wrote:

>Um, wow.
>
>Please keep your presumtions to yourself.
>
>On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Brian Densmore wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Granted there are better sources to search for a job,
>>than the local paper. I don't get it either, *but*, if
>>I was looking for work I would certainly be looking in the
>>paper as well as everywhere else. And I certainly would know
>>that the paper can be found at the local library. Furthermore,
>>anyone looking for an IT position should be able to use a 
>>computer to find that the Star classifieds are online. I
>>think that is what Brad was trying to say in his pointed
>>comment. I actually thought the post was a troll.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Jason Clinton 
>>>Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 8:52 PM
>>>
>>>Bradley Miller wrote:
>>>| At 04:00 PM 11/24/2003 -0800, xxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>|
>>>|> I don't get the paper...can you give me some direction as to where
>>>|> I can find contact/application info?
>>>|
>>>|
>>>| This might be your first clue (or lack thereof) on a IT based career
>>>| path.   Yikes.
>>>
>>>I really don't think the Star is all that useful. Any posting 
>>>there gets
>>>~ three times more applicants than the other more obscure 
>>>listing areas.
>>>You're better off to hit the obscure areas first.
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
*	*	*	*	*	*	*	*	*	

The Supreme Court has ruled that they cannot have a nativity scene in Washington, D.C. This wasn't 
for any religious reasons. They couldn't find three wise men and a virgin.
--Jay Leno