Heh, m4... Have you tried Postfix or Exim? What's the biggest load you've had in terms of load avg, queue size etc? What kind of machines have you run Sendmail on? I can tell you first hand that Sendmail does not handle being slammed like Postfix does. I've seen Ultra 2s (circa 97-98 SPARCs) running Sendmail get slammed with tens of thousands of messages at once, and it's not pretty. I've seen old versions of Netscape Mail server (3.x), Sendmail, Postfix, Exim, and a custom MTA written and run by a very large well-known free E-mail site owned by another very large well-known software company that starts with an M, and I can tell you that Sendmail is probably 2nd to last on that list in terms of performance. Scott Duane Attaway wrote: >Other mailers have much promise and I've tried many, but always return to >Sendmail. Sendmail is light on resources, has a wonderful m4 macro >language for configuration, and just works. > >