There you go!  I was actually trying to see how much interest there was
among the group in setting up such a system for our use, not which system to
use.

Gene

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net
> [mailto:owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Seth Dimbert
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 10:43 AM
> To: Gerald Combs; Jared Smith
> Cc: kclug@kclug.org
> Subject: RE: What to do with all of these links
>
>
> Just want to point out that both varieties of Nuke (Post- and Php-) are
> well-supported with large user-bases and active community forums.
> Plus, one
> of our own (think iLUG) is an experienced Php-Nuke admin.
>
> I dabble in Post-Nuke myself. If the group is interested and someone can
> give me FTP, SSH and MySQL rights to the KCLUG webspace, I can set a
> Post-Nuke CMS up in a matter of hours. I'm sure Php-Nuke (and other CMS's)
> can go up just as easily.
>
> The point is that it would be easy to set it up then see what we
> think about
> it.
>
> -SD
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net
> [mailto:owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Gerald Combs
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 10:13 AM
> To: Jared Smith
> Cc: kclug@kclug.org
> Subject: Re: What to do with all of these links
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jared Smith wrote:
>
> > I don't know about the current condition of slashcode but about a
> > year ago it was known as great but overcomplicated coding,
> > basically kludge upon kludge tailored specifically to the needs
> > of the slashdot crowd. There is better code out there, designed
> > from the bottom up for specific flavors of CMS.
>
> This is still the case.  There's a reason that VA has multiple coders
> working on Slash full time -- it would collapse otherwise.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>