-------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [OT]Resolution [was: Flat panel monitors] From: To: There are other issues for a panel besides resolution. A lot of it has to do with response time. Everyone knows that games on a laptops is horrible, but a desktop, well, it's expected to be able play games. My understanding is that to get quicker transistors (the panel is all transistors) they end up being a bit bigger, hence lower resolution. Kris. > My main question/point was: > > Why doesn't anyone produce stand-alone flat panel displays that have > the > same resolution as their same-sized laptop screen counterparts? > 1600x1200 looks great on my 15" laptop display. > > Gene > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net >> [mailto:owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Tony >> Zafiropoulos Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:08 PM >> To: Kclug >> Subject: Re: [OT]Resolution [was: Flat panel monitors] >> >> >> I bought a MAG innovision for $439 or so LT765S it can go to >> 1280x1024. >> >> BestBuy. >> >> I don't like some of it's black screen issues though, gets a bit >> fuzzy with a black window. >> >> Tony >> >> >> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Gene Dascher wrote: >> >> > Has anyone seen a standalone flat panel display that has >> resolution better >> > than 1024x728? Even the 17" ones I have looked at in the >> stores only go up >> > to that resolution. My laptop is 2 years old, and its 15" >> display goes up >> > to 1600x1200. >> > >> > Gene >> > >> >> -- >> Tony Zafiropoulos >> FixMyVirus.com >> Cel: 314-504-3974 >> tonyz@fixmyvirus.com >> Best way to reduce your virus exposure? >> Run Linux - Replace Windows one system at a time. >> >> >> >> majordomo@kclug.org Enter without the quotes in body of message > > > > majordomo@kclug.org Enter without the quotes in body of message