Whoa, you've just make a flood of posts implying that this is a nebulous 
issue.  No one is saying take away your rights to download pr0n, God 
forbid they take mine :)  We're talking about methods for filtering.   
And, drawing a boundary around what's agreeably inappropriate for 
children or the workplace is a no-brainer.  Things get fuzzy when you 
start talking about Britney Spears' latest outfit, but any boundary you 
draw will be around the hardcore stuff.

-- 
 |/ ____ |/ | Marvin Keith Bellamy
  @~/ Oo ~@  | AKA GodfatherofSoul
 /_( __/ )_ | website:  http://godfatherofsoul.tripod.com
    __U_/    | E-mail:   mbellamy@kc.rr.com

Jason Clinton wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> zscoundrel wrote:
> | The supreme court has already decided this one.  Community standards.
> |
> | Your City/County/State decides what should be allowed in public.  Note,
> | no censorship here, just what should be allowed in public and what
> | should be kept private.
> |
>
> This isn't comparable. Community standars apply to things like a 
> billboard on
> the side of a road that features three people engaging in group sex 
> that's an
> advertisement for Nike sneakers (a al 'Just Do It').
>
> If I choose not to see sexuality on the internet, I can do that. If a 
> search
> engine company is putting up banners for product or topics I find 
> disturbing, I
> don't use that search engine. The internet is both a public forum and 
> a private
> medium in which I get what I look for.
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQE9yBoctSqjk42zvwkRAi8sAJ4zIwVCVu/H6rUR8erfe+YAtg6C+gCgl+7H
> /1kfkUXPamlj99ZvZkMQcHw=
> =Tu/h
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>