I would like to see some real world comparisons. End-to-end comparisons of real tasks like operning spreadsheets, calculating data and spell-checking a 300 word letter. The kinds of tasks a real person migh encounter in the course of a real day. Oh, some timing on web surfing might be good too. I know my free cell works better and faster on Linux than it does on my wife's indenitcal 'doze 98 machine, and I have far fewer lock-ups, but as far as surfing or anything else, it is too close to call. One comparison I can see right off is the availablility of drivers for hardware. EVERY time I buy some hardware without checking to see of it is compatible, I regret it. Xerox seams to be the worst. Customer service does not return Email or phone messages when you tel them you have linux. I guess they only consider 'doze customers to be real customers. Anybody know if there are Linux drivers for the xerox m750 workcentre? I have looked and looked, but haven't found anything yet. I would just write it off and buy another printer, but I can't afford it right now, and the old HP I had been using is shot. Jonathan Hutchins wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jeremy Fowler [mailto:jfowler@westrope.com] > >> Well MaximumPC Magazine ... > > > .... never saw a Microsoft product it didn't love. > > Performance? Compared to what? XP on 1+ GHz out-performs 95 on a P200, > sure. That's how MS has been selling it's "performance improvements" all > along. But there's just no way that much code bloat can run faster or > better than NT4 or 95 on equivalent hardware. > > If you need real, side-by-side performance tests, several have been > published by "real" reviewers including Infoworld. I've got 'em here > somewhere, I'll post links. > > Relevant to Linux, I don't know if I've seen any tests comparing XP to, say, > Mandrake 8.1. Perhaps we could come up with some relevant tests? The only > thing I can think of right off would be to compare Netscape on Mandrake to > Netscape on 95 and on XP. (Does 4.7 run on XP at all?) What else could we > compare? > > > > -- At 20, I was liberal, because I had nothing to lose and so much to gain. by 40, I was conservative, because I had so much to lose and so little to gain. Isn't it amazing what 20 years of hard work and experience will do for ones' point of view?