On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Brian Densmore wrote:

> I don't recall (maybe .10 or .12). All I recall is it kept crashing my
> box, and I got tired of fscking my system.

Wow!  I remember those days.  Back then it was still a hack of fvwm.  

Those are also the days that gave E the bad rep of hogging memmory.  It 
really doesn't anymore (well, depends on how you configure it).

> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gene Dascher [mailto:gedascher@multiservice.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:04 PM
> > To: Kclug
> > Subject: RE: enlightenment
> > 
> > 
> > You're kidding me!  What version did you try?  I have been 
> > using 0.16.5 for
> > quite some time, and I LOVE IT!  The menu system is great and 
> > there is a lot
> > of nice eye candy as well.  enlightenment 0.17 is supposed to 
> > be a full
> > featured window manager, so you don't have to run Gnome or 
> > KDE, but you'll
> > supposedly be able to run Gnome/KDE programs with no problems.
> > 
> > Gene
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Densmore [mailto:DensmoreB@ctbsonline.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 14:50
> > To: Gene Dascher
> > Subject: RE: enlightenment
> > 
> > 
> > Tried enlightenment once. What a *#@$%^&%$@! nightmare!
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gene Dascher [mailto:gedascher@multiservice.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:50 PM
> > > To: Kclug
> > > Subject: enlightenment
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyone playing with enlightenment 0.17 yet?  I am anxious to
> > > try it as soon
> > > as I get my pc up and running correctly again.
> > >
> > > Gene
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > majordomo@kclug.org
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > majordomo@kclug.org
> > 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
//========================================================\
||  D. Hageman                    <dhageman@dracken.com>  ||
\========================================================//