From: mark@taylor.uucp (Mark A. Davis) Subject: Re: WordProcessor (~=TEX) for Linux Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1993 18:01:41 GMT
snail@lsl.co.uk writes:
>In article <1993Sep24.111523@cs.utwente.nl>, debruijn@cs.utwente.nl (Steef S.G. de Bruijn) writes:
>> |> a la WordPerfect for Linux.
>I think he means Framemaker for Linux, or 'Word for Linux' :-)
>> Wordperfert sucks (it's no misspell!)
>Don't u mean worddefect, as its know here. We have it one the Vomit Making
>System.
Kindly keep your personal and unproductive comments to your self. We find
the software to be extremely productive, flexible, cost effective, and
open. Perhaps you two should tell us which wordprocessors you use and like
so others can say yours suck.
Also, perhaps you should enlighten us as
to a better wordprocessing system under Unix? Framemaker isn't bad, but
TERRIBLY expensive.
-- /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Mark A. Davis | Lake Taylor Hospital | Norfolk, VA (804)-461-5001x431 | | Sys.Administrator| Computer Services | mark@taylor.wyvern.com .uucp | \--------------------------------------------------------------------------/