From: rhealey@gorp.ssesco.com (Rob Healey) Subject: Re: BSD UNIX Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1993 13:43:12 GMT
In article <michaelv.747102277@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu> michaelv@iastate.edu (Michael L. VanLoon) writes:
>In <CGD.93Sep3160517@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU> cgd@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou) writes:
>
>> amiga "production"
>
>>re: amiga: just because binaries aren't available on -lamp doesn't
>>mean it's not in production use... there are many places carrying
>>binaries for it in europe, but their names all escape me right now...
>
>Finally, a reason to buy an Amiga... :-) I'm almost tempted.
>
Hey now! B^). I'll pit the 3000's 0.9 I/O performance against any
386 or 486 based system any day!
I hear the screen/console code doesn't take full advantage of
the hardware yet tho. And there is the issue of shared, or
better yet dynamic, librarys.
I run SVR4 on my Amiga tho so I'm not 100% up to date on 0.9's
status.
-Rob