From: Brandon S. Allbery (bsa@kf8nh.wariat.org)
Date: 05/11/93 

From: bsa@kf8nh.wariat.org (Brandon S. Allbery)
Subject: Re: 386/486 disassembler?
Date: Tue, 11 May 1993 16:28:32 GMT

In article <C6u4o9.1uo@oea.hobby.nl> dan@oea.hobby.nl (Dan Naas) writes:
>Harald Koenig (koenig@nova.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de) wrote:
>: I'm locking for a disassembler for Linux executables, object files,
>: binary blobs of code etc. which outputs hex bytes and mnemonics
>: (syntax doesn't matter, just human readable).
>
> Why do you need a disassembler when you have the source code?????

For locating gcc botches, perhaps? I found an interesting one in gcc 2.3.3
under SCO the other day, that wasn't in any sense implied by the source code I
fed it....

++Brandon 

-- 
Brandon S. Allbery         kf8nh@kf8nh.ampr.org          bsa@kf8nh.wariat.org

It's not too late to turn back from the "Gates" of Hell...
Linux: the free 32-bit operating system, available NOW. Why waaaaaait for NT?