From: heiko@chemie.fu-berlin.de (Heiko Schlichting) Subject: Re: Wanted: Poor Man's Sendmail Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1993 18:35:41 GMT
chr@senga.ka.sub.org (Christian Riede) writes:
> Elmar Folba writes:
>
>> is there a poor man's substitute for sendmail or smail?
>> I can't do more than send, via uucp, all outbound mail to this particular
>> 'smart' host for further propagation / routing: and it occurred to me that
>> for this simple purpose sendmail and the current smail (3.1.28, I think)
>> is somewhat of an overkill.
>
>Perhaps smail2.5.
Better use smail3.1.28 - it could be as easy as smail2.5 but has less bugs
and you're open to expand if this is needed sometimes in the future.
smail2.5 is not smart to the postmaster of your feed because it had
problems with %!@ combinations and often generates an envelope address
without domain which is a bad thing for a private site in Germany like
Elmars 'gulasch.hanse.de'.
Heiko