From: qx@shire.math.columbia.edu (Qi Xia) Subject: Re: Why not BSD-FFS ? (Was : [Q] newextfs) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1993 04:34:56 GMT
Article 30675 of comp.os.linux:
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Path: sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sun4nl!tedux!mo!hans
From: hans@mo.hobby.nl (Hans Oey)
Subject: Re: Why not BSD-FFS? Was: [Q] newextfs
References: <1993Mar5.161001.7650@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>
Organization: Makkee & Oey
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1993 10:12:31 GMT
Message-ID: <1993Mar6.101231.15243@mo.hobby.nl>
Lines: 12
qx@shire.math.columbia.edu (Qi Xia) writes:
>2). BSD ufs was developed many years ago. The best technology then may
> not be the best today.
>3). BSD ufs is designed for large systems. Currently, Linux only run
> on PC.
My PC today might be `larger' then large systems then. :-)