From: Stephen Pierce (spierce@wam.umd.edu)
Date: 02/28/93


From: spierce@wam.umd.edu (Stephen Pierce)
Subject: Re: Problems with TCP/IP.
Date: 1 Mar 1993 04:24:42 GMT

In article <1993Feb28.233323.7275@sol.UVic.CA> pmacdona@sanjuan (Peter MacDonald) writes:
>In article <1993Feb28.222852.3622@wam.umd.edu> spierce@wam.umd.edu (Stephen Pierce) writes:
>>In article <1mrc33INN16p@crcnis1.unl.edu> hosier@unl.edu (aaron hosier) writes:
>>>spierce@wam.umd.edu (Stephen Pierce) writes:
>...
>>>the other computer. I admit that it has greatly improved under 99pl5,
>...
>> At last, someone who is having the same problem as I. I wonder why
>...
>>some help to figure out what's happening here.
>
>
>Well, you asked. Patch level 6 was released a week ago. Why don't you
>give that a try. [. . .]
>
>Peter

  I got linux .99.6 within 24 hours of it's release. I've been having TCP/IP
problems since .99 came out! Curiously, this did not happen over christmas
when I was using the .98.? boot disk that SLS created. I tried compiling
and running .98.6 for a while, to try to get it to break, but I could not get
the kernal to compile. I had erased my old boot disk, so I can't see if it
was the kernal, or the new SLS (Early Jan) that I installed over the old
SLS (Dec 12th) that broke my tcp.

  If anyone has a Image file of linux .99.4,5 or 6, that has TCP/IP, NFS,
procfs, boots off of hda2, and does NOT have SCSI (locks my comp), I would
LOVE it if you could send me e-mail.

  Peter, if you want to help me track this down, I'd be glad to try out any
and all suggestions, short of mkefs'ing my HD. Please send me e-mail, and
I'll describe my problem in detail to you.

Steve