• Next message: Christopher A. Smith: "[Q] Interviews 3.1 on Sunsite?"
• Previous message: Russell Webb: "ST01: "SCSI Host adaptor failure" (normal or DOA?)"
• Maybe in reply to: Neil Russell: "MIPS R3000 board project; update."
• Next in thread: Craig I. Hagan: "Re: MIPS R3000 board project; update."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: hedrick@geneva.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick)
Subject: Re: MIPS R3000 board project; update.
Date: 19 Jun 1993 18:17:34 GMT

hagan@freya.cs.umass.edu (Craig I. Hagan) writes:

[about mach 3.0]
> * development could only be done by those with USL
> licence holders.

If you're running the full Mach system from CMU, you need a USL license.
However the license only applies to the Unix server. The Mach
micro-kernel itself is free of licensing problems.

My primary concern about Mach is that a micro-kernel that's larger
than the whole Linux kernel seems a bit odd.

• Next message: Christopher A. Smith: "[Q] Interviews 3.1 on Sunsite?"
• Previous message: Russell Webb: "ST01: "SCSI Host adaptor failure" (normal or DOA?)"
• Maybe in reply to: Neil Russell: "MIPS R3000 board project; update."
• Next in thread: Craig I. Hagan: "Re: MIPS R3000 board project; update."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]