From: urlichs@smurf.sub.org (Matthias Urlichs) Subject: Re: C++ is yucky Date: 11 Jul 1993 19:35:34 +0200
In comp.os.linux, article <MIKE.93Jul9103012@pdx095.intel.com>,
mike@ichips.intel.com writes:
> Some of us prefer a language with a well-defined
> grammar, and well-defined semantics. C++ has neither. For examples
> of how C++ lacks a decent grammar, see Jim Roskind's paper on the
You have a point here ... up to a point. ;-)
> subject. As for semantics, can you tell me, say, when implicitly
> created temporary objects are destroyed?
As long as they _are_ destroyed, if you write your code right the order
shouldn't matter, right?
-- Never purchase anything with a handle on it -- it means work. -- Matthias Urlichs -- urlichs@smurf.sub.org -- Phone: NONE; use email or lose. Schleiermacherstrasse 12 -- 90491 Nuernberg -- Germany || Linux+Mac Consulting