From: hjl@nynexst.com (H.J. Lu) Subject: Re: Working limits.h? Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1993 15:12:29 GMT
In article <harringtC9wGEu.DF9@netcom.com>, harringt@netcom.com (Steve Harrington) writes:
|> pdcawley@iest.demon.co.uk (Piers Cawley) writes:
|> >I'm sure there was something about this posted recently, but I missed
|> >it. I've been having problems compiling stuff under gcc 2.4.3 with
|> >lib4.4*, the compiler falls over at the #include_next <limits.h> line.
|> >I've worked round it by hacking the defines so it doesn't include the
|> >machine specific limits.h but uses it's own definitions. However, this
|> >is not what I'd call elegant. If anyone has a working version of this,
|> >I'd appreciate pointers to it.
|>
|> >aTdHvAaNnKcSe
|> >--
|> >+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
|> >| Piers Cawley | |
|> >| pdcawley@iest.demon.co.uk | THIS SPACE TO LET |
|> >| pdcawley@cix.compulink.co.uk | |
|> >+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
|> I've had the same problems (and used the same solution). Please
|> post any replies.
|>
|> Steve Harrington
|> harringt@netcom.com
Libc 4.4.1 has fixed that problem along with obstack stuff.
H.J.