From: crd6@po.CWRU.Edu (Chad R. Dougherty) Subject: Re: Fonts not compressed, oopps Date: 22 Feb 1993 05:38:31 GMT
In a previous article, mirons@ccs.northeastern.edu (Michael A. Irons) says:
>
>
> Linux should not be a system you have to be a hacker to use,
>but a system you can hack. This is the only other free unix available
>and you can't expect put up a sign 'unix gurus only need apply, all
>else put up, or shut up'. There are alot of people here who's first
>exposure to unix will be Linux, or BSD. There's nothing you can do
>about it, it's free and people are going to come here first. You can't
>expect everyone to know how to use this, and they are asking
>questions. Making things simpler keeps the COL traffic down, and
>that's something everyone would like.
>
> Recently people on COL have developed am attitude that'll kill
>off Linux real quick. I tried to point out an inaccuracy in a major
>package and got:
>
>From: Joseph T. Batt <battjt@hicksjl.test.rose-hulman.edu>
>> Hey jerk-
>>
>> Your have some options here:
>>
>> 1. Use DOS and don't bitch to us....
>
>From: Jonathan Magid <jem@sunsite.unc.edu>
>> Users with difficulties spelling "multipule" and those who are too lazy to
>> reach for a dictionary shows poor education and training, and
>> unfortunatly [sic] is very typical of linux users these days.
>>
>> As for confusing programming with technical writing... I wonder exactly
>> where *your* skills are. Obviously not writing. Nor programming, as I have
>> yet to see the first release of "Mirix".
>>
>>Save your criticisms until you have grounds from which to speak.
>
>
>From: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
>> 2. is mentioned in the docs, but I know, noone ever reads them. Why
>> should you...
>
>> If you don't like my decision just go for it and release the next
>> distribution yourself.
>
>> Be careful what you say, and in what a way you say it.
>> Read /usr/X386/doc/NOTES-1.2. That's what docs are made for. The
>> README in that dierectory is hacked by Orest, not by me.
>
> People complain about the traffic on the net, and all the
>questions, but '/usr/X386/doc/NOTES-1.2' isn't really the place for
>install instructions, especially if there is a file that comes with
>the tar files as install instructions.
>
> Why should I, or anyone else who's seen this thread want to
>contribute to Linux? I have friends, who are very competant in their
>fields, been told they don't know what they are talking about by
>people on this group & in the lists.They don't want anything to do
>with Linux now beacuse of the attitude sent their way. I remeber a
>posting from someone who got flammed off the TAPE list for asking a
>tape related question. I tend to email alot of people help on things
>when they ask questions about things I've had trouble with.
>
> When someone points out "this is confusing, please change it"
>and they get falmed for it, that's sad.
>
> I would like Linus' opinion on this matter.
>
>--
>
> Mike Irons;
> mirons@Dworkin.CCS.Northeastern.EDU (School)
> mirons%icarus.uucp@MecEng.COE.Northeastern.EDU (Home)
>
Thank you very much for this reply. Although I myself haven't seen
this attitude much in this newsgroup (I'm relatively new), I have seen it
elsewhere and it made me angry. What did these same people who rip on
others now do when they needed help with something? And so what if some
people spill a kupple wurds wrong now and then. If people do this kind of
stuff, there should be a new newsgroup; c.o.l.know_it_alls_only.
--| Chad Dougherty | "When angry, count ten, when | | Case Western Reserve Univ. | very angry, swear." | | crd6@po.cwru.edu | -Mark Twain |