From: andrewc@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Andrew J. Cosgriff !) Subject: Re: xdtm for Linux Date: 21 Feb 1993 04:18:08 GMT
tfoley@camaro.uucp (Tim Foley) writes:
> I just got xdtm 2.5 and was just starting to compile it, the makefile
>seems to be a mess, missing the tabs in the proper places etc. And X_OK is
>undefined so far... Fun stuff...
>
> Before I go hog wild on this, has anyone tried / suceeded in getting xdtm
>to run under Linux ? If so, drop some email as to how it went/how far you
>got.
>
Well, i went a little further and commented bits out and in and fiddled around such
that i got a binary, but running it jst listed the shared libraries (like when you do
an ldd <file> )
This was around Nov. last year...
i even read recently on comp.windows.x.apps that some poeple still use 1.5 instead
because it's less buggy or something like that...
Enjoy !
Cos !
-- =============================================================================== * Andrew J. Cosgriff ! * "Connect the goddamn dots !" (Ministry) #define HERE cc.monash.edu.au #include <std_disclaimer.h> Hassle me at : andrewc@aurora.HERE ; andrewc@lindblat.HERE ; cos@yoyo.HERE